From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krasner v. Reed

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 29, 1947
30 So. 2d 734 (Ala. 1947)

Opinion

6 Div. 582.

May 29, 1947.

D. Krasner, pro se.

Benners, Burr, Stokely McKamy, of Birmingham, opposed.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals. One of the prerequisites to invoking the jurisdiction of this court for such a review is that the application for certiorari be accompanied by a brief pointing out and arguing the point or decision sought to be revised, with a certification attached or embodied therein that a copy of said brief has been served on counsel for the opposing side, if the adverse party was represented by counsel in the Court of Appeals. Supreme Court Rule 44, as amended, Code 1940, Title 7 Appendix.

The rule was not complied with. No brief accompanied the application and, of consequence, the petition must be dismissed. Allen v. State, ante, p. 201, 30 So.2d 483; Gulf, M. O. R. Co. v. Scott, 248 Ala. 250, 27 So.2d 152; Ex parte Locklear, 205 Ala. 236, 87 So. 712; Birmingham Waterworks Co. v. Edwards, 202 Ala. 503, 80 So. 791.

Petition dismissed.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Krasner v. Reed

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 29, 1947
30 So. 2d 734 (Ala. 1947)
Case details for

Krasner v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:KRASNER et al. v. REED

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: May 29, 1947

Citations

30 So. 2d 734 (Ala. 1947)
249 Ala. 240

Citing Cases

Krasner v. Reed

Affirmed. Petition for certiorari dismissed by Supreme Court in Krasner v. Reed, 249 Ala. 240, 30 So.2d 734.…

Hardin v. State

Smith v. State, 241 Ala. 99, 1 So.2d 313; Sartain v. State, 263 Ala. 395, 82 So.2d 347. Moreover, the…