From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krantz v. Van Dette

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 19, 1959
272 F.2d 709 (6th Cir. 1959)

Opinion

No. 13801.

December 19, 1959.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio; Paul C. Weick, Judge.

A.H. Oldham, Akron, Ohio, Lee C. McCandless, Butler, Pa., Robert E. Woodhams, of Woodhams, Blanchard Flynn, Kalamazoo, Mich., on brief, for appellant.

Francis J. Klempay, Youngstown, Ohio, for appellees.

Before MARTIN and CECIL, Circuit Judges, and MILLER, District Judge.


After a comprehensive trial in the district court, the complaint of the appellant-inventor, asking recovery against appellees of royalties under three license agreements, was dismissed. From the order of dismissal, this appeal is taken and has been heard and duly considered upon the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys and upon the record in the case.

Judge Weick, the trial judge, now a member of this court, wrote an opinion carefully discussing the pertinent issues in the case; and, in our view, correctly deciding them.

Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court reported at 165 F. Supp. 776, the order dismissing the complaint is affirmed.


Summaries of

Krantz v. Van Dette

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 19, 1959
272 F.2d 709 (6th Cir. 1959)
Case details for

Krantz v. Van Dette

Case Details

Full title:Walter W. KRANTZ, Appellant, v. Richard W. VAN DETTE and Virgil P. Van…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Dec 19, 1959

Citations

272 F.2d 709 (6th Cir. 1959)