From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kramer v. Pachyinski

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 22, 2024
22-cv-03803-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2024)

Opinion

22-cv-03803-WHO (PR)

02-22-2024

ANDREW KRAMER, Plaintiff, v. PACHYINSKI, Defendant.


ORDER CLOSING ACTION

WLLIAMH. ORRICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In my prior order, I granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and gave plaintiff Andrew Kramer leave to file an amended complaint by February 1, 2024, through which he could pursue his claims against San Quentin State Prison under the Americans With Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act. (Dkt. No. 23.) He has filed nothing since the last order was filed and the filing deadline for the amended complaint has expired. Accordingly, the Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kramer v. Pachyinski

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 22, 2024
22-cv-03803-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Kramer v. Pachyinski

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW KRAMER, Plaintiff, v. PACHYINSKI, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 22, 2024

Citations

22-cv-03803-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2024)