Summary
In Kovar v. City of Cleveland, Ohio App., 102 N.E.2d 472, 60 Ohio Law Abst. 579, state law provided for registration tags on dogs and city ordinance provided for muzzling of dogs by owners when they are permitted to run at large and for impoundment if found at large unmuzzled.
Summary of this case from Rapid City v. TuningOpinion
No. 32586
Decided May 2, 1951.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Municipal corporations — Ordinance requiring impounding and disposition of unmuzzled dogs — Sale or gift to hospitals and laboratories for experimental purposes — Taxpayer's action to enjoin — Power of municipalities to provide for disposition of stray dogs — Section 3, Article XVIII, Constitution.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga county.
Mr. Harry J. Dworkin, for appellants.
Mr. Lee C. Howley, director of law, and Mr. James M. McSweeney, for appellees.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.