From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kovalenko v. Kirkland & Ellis LLP

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 9, 2024
4:22-CV-05990-HSG (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2024)

Opinion

4:22-CV-05990-HSG

05-09-2024

ZOYA KOVALENKO, Plaintiff, v. KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, MICHAEL DE VRIES, MICHAEL W. DE VRIES, P.C., ADAM ALPER, ADAM R. ALPER, P.C., AKSHAY DEORAS, AKSHAY S. DEORAS, P.C., AND MARK FAHEY, Defendants.

LYNNE C. HERMLE (STATE BAR NO. 99779) JOSEPH C. LIBURT (STATE BAR NO. 155507) ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP KATE JUVINALL (STATE BAR NO. 315659) MARK THOMPSON (Admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendants TANVIR H. RAHMAN (Admitted pro hac vice) FILIPPATOS PLLC SAMUEL BROWN (STATE BAR NO. 308558) Attorneys for Plaintiff Zoya Kovalenko


LYNNE C. HERMLE (STATE BAR NO. 99779) JOSEPH C. LIBURT (STATE BAR NO. 155507) ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP KATE JUVINALL (STATE BAR NO. 315659) MARK THOMPSON (Admitted pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendants

TANVIR H. RAHMAN (Admitted pro hac vice) FILIPPATOS PLLC SAMUEL BROWN (STATE BAR NO. 308558) Attorneys for Plaintiff Zoya Kovalenko

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO ALL DEFENDANTS [N.D. CAL. CIV. L.R. 6-2]

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

[counsel listed on following page]

Defendants Kirkland & Ellis LLP (“K&E”), Michael De Vries, Michael W. De Vries, P.C., Adam Alper, Adam R. Alper, P.C., Akshay Deoras, Akshay S. Deoras, P.C., and Mark Fahey (collectively, “Defendants”) and Plaintiff Zoya Kovalenko (“Plaintiff”) (Plaintiff and Defendant collectively, the “Parties”), hereby stipulate pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2 as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served her First Requests for Production to All Defendants (the “Requests”) on April 20, 2024;

WHEREAS, the current deadline for Defendants to respond to the Requests is May 20, 2024;

WHEREAS, it is Defendants' position that Plaintiff should have served document requests on each Defendant individually rather than on all eight (8) Defendants, collectively, and Plaintiff disagrees.

WHEREAS, Defendants require additional time to respond to the 68 Document Requests on behalf of each of the eight (8) Defendants;

WHEREAS, the Parties agree to extend the deadline for Defendants to respond to the Requests until June 19, 2024;

WHEREAS, the previous time modifications in this case are as follows:

• A stipulation to specially set the briefing schedule on nine of Defendants' motions filed in response to Plaintiff's Complaint was filed on December 20, 2022 (Dkt. 43) and granted on December 21, 2022 (Dkt. 44).

• A stipulation to extend deadlines to comply with initial discovery obligations pursuant to General Order No. 71 and to set the briefing schedule for K&E's Anti-SLAPP Motion was filed on January 9, 2023 (Dkt. 59) and granted on January 10, 2023 (Dkt. 61).

• A stipulation under Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) to extend time for Plaintiff to object/respond to K&E's First Sets of Interrogatories and Requests for Production from September 7, 2023 to October 9, 2023 was filed on August 30, 2023 (Dkt. 93).

• A stipulation under Civil Local Rule 6-2 to extend time for Defendants to answer Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint was filed on September 26, 2023 (Dkt. 95) and granted on September 27, 2023 (Dkt. 96).

• A stipulation under Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) to extend time for Plaintiff to object/respond to K&E's First Sets of Interrogatories and Requests for Production from October 9, 2023 to November 8, 2023 was filed on October 6, 2023 (Dkt. 100).

• A stipulation under Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2 to extend time regarding Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint was filed on October 27, 2023 (Dkt. 104) and granted on October 30, 2023 (Dkt. 106).

• A stipulation under Civil Local Rule 6-2 to specially set a briefing schedule on Plaintiff's motion to quash and to reset hearing dates was filed on December 27, 2023 (Dkt. 114) and was granted on December 28, 2023 (Dkt. 115).

WHEREAS, the brief extension of time requested here would have no effect on the schedule for this case as no case schedule has yet been entered.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Parties that the deadline for Defendants to file a response to the Requests is extended to June 19, 2024.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kovalenko v. Kirkland & Ellis LLP

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 9, 2024
4:22-CV-05990-HSG (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Kovalenko v. Kirkland & Ellis LLP

Case Details

Full title:ZOYA KOVALENKO, Plaintiff, v. KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, MICHAEL DE VRIES…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 9, 2024

Citations

4:22-CV-05990-HSG (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2024)