From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kotarba v. Bobrow

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts
Dec 4, 2018
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 90587 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)

Opinion

Motion No: 2018-00090 KC

12-04-2018

Artur Kotarba, Respondent, v. Andrea Bobrow, Appellant.


THOMAS P. ALIOTTA

DAVID ELLIOT, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by respondent for a preference in the calendaring of an appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, entered April 25, 2017. Separate motion by respondent to dismiss the appeal for lack of prosecution. Separate motion by appellant for an enlargement of time to perfect the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of respondent's motions and appellant's motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that respondent's motions and appellant's motion are consolidated for purposes of disposition; and it is further,

ORDERED that respondent's motions are denied; and it is further,

ORDERED that appellant's motion is granted and the time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to February 4, 2019; and it is further,

ORDERED that in the event the appeal is not perfected on or before February 4, 2019, the court, on its own motion, may dismiss the appeal, or respondent may move to dismiss the appeal, on three days' notice, and may serve such application in person.

ENTER:

Paul Kenny

Chief Clerk


Summaries of

Kotarba v. Bobrow

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts
Dec 4, 2018
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 90587 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)
Case details for

Kotarba v. Bobrow

Case Details

Full title:Artur Kotarba, Respondent, v. Andrea Bobrow, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts

Date published: Dec 4, 2018

Citations

2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 90587 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 90588
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 90589