From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koskoff v. Planning and Zoning Commission of Haddam

Supreme Court of Connecticut
May 28, 1992
222 Conn. 912 (Conn. 1992)

Opinion

Thomas P. Byrne, in support of the petition.

David E. Koskoff, pro se, in opposition.

Decided May 28, 1992


The named defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 443, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court's decision and remand the case with direction to grant the writ of mandamus on the ground that a failure of a planning and zoning commission properly to publish a prehearing notice, as required by General Statutes 8-26, amounted to a failure of the commission to act pursuant to General Statutes 8-26 and 8-26d?"


Summaries of

Koskoff v. Planning and Zoning Commission of Haddam

Supreme Court of Connecticut
May 28, 1992
222 Conn. 912 (Conn. 1992)
Case details for

Koskoff v. Planning and Zoning Commission of Haddam

Case Details

Full title:DAVID E. KOSKOFF v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF HADDAM…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: May 28, 1992

Citations

222 Conn. 912 (Conn. 1992)
608 A.2d 695

Citing Cases

Williams v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities

When time constraints or limits relate to the essence of the purpose of legislation, which legislation is…

One Elmcroft Stamford, LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the City of Stamford

(Citations omitted.) Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals , 223 Conn. 171, 175, 610 A.2d 1301 (1992) ; see also…