From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kortz v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jun 25, 2013
402 S.W.3d 157 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. WD 75060.

2013-06-25

Mark A. KORTZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Harrison County, Missouri, Jack N. Peace, Judge. Amy M. Bartholow, Columbia, MO, for appellant. Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of Harrison County, Missouri, Jack N. Peace, Judge.
Amy M. Bartholow, Columbia, MO, for appellant. Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Four: JAMES E. WELSH, Chief Judge, VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge and MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge.

ORDER


PER CURIAM:

Mark Kortz appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, he claims that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to keep evidence of his uncharged crimes and bad acts from the jury. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandumhas been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Kortz v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jun 25, 2013
402 S.W.3d 157 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Kortz v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mark A. KORTZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jun 25, 2013

Citations

402 S.W.3d 157 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)