From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Konstantin v. Aerosvit Airlines

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Mar 21, 2013
39 Misc. 3d 130 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

No. 2011–2822 K C.

2013-03-21

Paderno KONSTANTIN, Respondent, v. AEROSVIT AIRLINES, Appellant.


Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Johnny Lee Baynes, J.), dated May 19, 2011. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $434.
Present: PESCE, P.J., WESTON and SOLOMON, JJ.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, without costs, and the action is dismissed.

In this small claims action, plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $734, representing damages he allegedly incurred as a result of a delay in international air travel. At a nonjury trial, the evidence established that plaintiff had purchased an airline ticket from defendant to travel from Kiev, Ukraine, to New York, with an intermediate stop in Tel Aviv, Israel. However, due to a delay leaving Kiev, plaintiff failed to make his connecting flight in Tel Aviv. Defendant provided him with a hotel room in Tel Aviv and a ticket to complete his journey on El Al Airlines. Plaintiff arrived in New York on December 26, 2010, 13 hours later than originally scheduled. Following the trial, the Civil Court awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $434.

Even in the Small Claims Part of the court, proof of damages is an essential element of a prima facie case ( see Estevez v. Skorishchenko, 33 Misc.3d 138 [A], 2011 N.Y. Slip Op 52076[U] [App Term, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2011] ). Since plaintiff failed to provide any proof of his claimed expenses, we conclude that the judgment in his favor failed to render substantial justice between the parties in accordance with the rules and principles of substantive law (CCA 1804, 1807).

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the action is dismissed.

PESCE, P.J., WESTON and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Konstantin v. Aerosvit Airlines

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Mar 21, 2013
39 Misc. 3d 130 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Konstantin v. Aerosvit Airlines

Case Details

Full title:Paderno Konstantin, Respondent, v. Aerosvit Airlines, Appellant.

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Mar 21, 2013

Citations

39 Misc. 3d 130 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 50462
969 N.Y.S.2d 804

Citing Cases

Garcia v. Cater

In a small claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether "substantial justice has ...…