From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kolkebeck v. Home Depot U.S., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Aug 14, 2015
Case No. 2:14-cv-00514-CW-DBP (D. Utah Aug. 14, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 2:14-cv-00514-CW-DBP

08-14-2015

ERIC DANIEL KOLKEBECK, Plaintiff, v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., Defendant.


MEMORANDUM DECISION District Judge Clark Waddoups Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Rule 56(d) Motion for Additional Discovery. (Dkt. 31.) The Court being fully advised of the premises,

HEREBY GRANTS Defendant's Motion. Defendant has up to and including August 21, 2015, to file it response to Plaintiff's Rule 56(d) Motion for Additional Discovery.

Additionally, the parties are reminded that proposed orders for motions to extend time and other stipulated motions must be "emailed in an editable format to the chambers of the assigned judge." D.U. Civ. R. 7-1(a). Dated this 14th day of August, 2015.

By the Court:

/s/_________

Dustin B. Pead

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Kolkebeck v. Home Depot U.S., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Aug 14, 2015
Case No. 2:14-cv-00514-CW-DBP (D. Utah Aug. 14, 2015)
Case details for

Kolkebeck v. Home Depot U.S., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ERIC DANIEL KOLKEBECK, Plaintiff, v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Date published: Aug 14, 2015

Citations

Case No. 2:14-cv-00514-CW-DBP (D. Utah Aug. 14, 2015)