From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kohus v. Ohio State Highway Patrol

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 29, 2011
Case No. 1:09cv658 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 29, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09cv658.

March 29, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") filed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on February 15, 2011 (Doc. 120). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).

A notice was attached to the Report regarding objections. (Doc. 120, 33.)

Despite the fact that the Court gave Plaintiff Kohus an extension of time to object (Doc. 124), no objection to the Report has been filed. Instead, Plaintiff Kohus has improperly filed Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice Under Rule 41(a) (Doc. 125). By rule, such a voluntary dismissal must be "signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); see also Green v. Nevers, 111 F.3d 1295, 1300 (6th Cir. 1997) (holding that a stipulation of dismissal that did not contain the signatures of every party with an interest in the outcome of a case was not a valid dismissal). Plaintiff Kohus's dismissal was only signed by himself. (Doc. 125.)

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, this Court finds the Report to be correct. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report is hereby ADOPTED. As the Report recommended (Doc. 120, 32), Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 56) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMSISED with PREJUDICE and stricken from the active docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kohus v. Ohio State Highway Patrol

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 29, 2011
Case No. 1:09cv658 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Kohus v. Ohio State Highway Patrol

Case Details

Full title:Trooper Matthew D. Kohus, Plaintiff, v. Ohio State Highway Patrol, et al…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Mar 29, 2011

Citations

Case No. 1:09cv658 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 29, 2011)

Citing Cases

Helm v. Halperin

"The type of liberty interest that Roth is intended to protect is a significant one, one akin to the right to…

Bowles v. MaComb Cmty. Coll.

However, this claim fails; the Sixth Circuit has made it clear that “employers have no ‘affirmative duty' to…