From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KOHL v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Sep 13, 1988
755 S.W.2d 314 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 54180.

June 7, 1988. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 6, 1988. Application to Transfer Denied September 13, 1988.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY, KENNETH M. WEINSTOCK, J.

Richard Fox, St. Louis, for plaintiffs-appellants.

David M. Duree, St. Louis, for defendant-respondent.


Insureds appeal from the judgment of the trial court declaring insurance company was not liable under automobile liability policy. Appellants' appeal is dismissed for failure to file a timely notice of appeal.

Nonetheless, we examined the case on the merits and concluded we would have affirmed the trial court's judgment.

For purposes of appeal a judgment becomes final thirty days after the entry of such judgment, if no timely motion for new trial is filed. Rule 81.05(a). If a motion for new trial is filed the judgment becomes final on the date of disposition of such motion or if not ruled upon, the judgment becomes final at the expiration of ninety days after the filing of such motion. Rule 81.05(a). A notice of appeal must be filed not later than ten days after the judgment appealed from becomes final. Rule 81.04(a). In Missouri the timely filing of a notice of appeal is a prerequisite to appellate jurisdiction. Hurn v. Sendlein, 669 S.W.2d 283, 284 (Mo.App. 1984).

We must consider our jurisdiction sua sponte even though neither party questions our jurisdiction. Dunn v. Dunn, 650 S.W.2d 638 (Mo.App. 1983). In the present case, the trial court entered its judgment on October 15, 1987. Appellants filed a motion for new trial on October 30, 1987. The trial court overruled the motion on December 18, 1987. To be timely the notice of appeal should have been filed on or before December 28, 1987. Appellants did not file their notice of appeal until December 30, 1987. Thus, the notice of appeal is not timely.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

STEPHAN, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI, J., concur.


Summaries of

KOHL v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Sep 13, 1988
755 S.W.2d 314 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

KOHL v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS KOHL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Sep 13, 1988

Citations

755 S.W.2d 314 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

McGee v. Allen

In deciding if Defendant timely filed his notice of appeal, we first recognize that a notice of appeal must…

In re Estate of Forhan

Although neither of the parties question our jurisdiction to hear this appeal, we are required to do so sua…