From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koghan v. The Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 22, 2024
4:23-cv-03289-YGR (N.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2024)

Opinion

4:23-cv-03289-YGR

04-22-2024

STEVEN KOGHAN, Plaintiff, v. The Prudential Insurance Co. of AMERICA, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MOTION SHOULD NOT BE TERMINATED AS MOOT

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

The Court recently granted plaintiff Steven Koghan's motion to relate the above-captioned matter to Steven Koghan v. The Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., Case No. 4:24-cv-02043-YGR.

The Court now turns to plaintiff's pending motion to stay this action until such time as plaintiff exhausts his administrative appeals. (See Dkt. No. 22.) As pled in the complaint filed in the recently related matter, he has now done so.

Thus, the Court ORDERS plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE why his motion shall not be terminated as moot. Koghan shall file a response of no more than three (3) pages by no later than Monday, April 29, 2024. Failure to do so shall be treated as a concession that termination of the motion is appropriate. If plaintiff files a response, defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America is entitled to file a reply of no more than three (3) pages by Friday, May 3, 2024.

It Is So Ordered.


Summaries of

Koghan v. The Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 22, 2024
4:23-cv-03289-YGR (N.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Koghan v. The Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN KOGHAN, Plaintiff, v. The Prudential Insurance Co. of AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 22, 2024

Citations

4:23-cv-03289-YGR (N.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2024)