From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kofoed v. Kroger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Mar 8, 2012
3:11-CV-00444-AC (D. Or. Mar. 8, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-CV-00444-AC

03-08-2012

JOSEPH W. KOFOED, Plaintiff, v. JOHN KROGER, Attorney General/Oregon; JOHN KITZHABER, Governor/Oregon; LINDA IGNOWSKI, Oregon Liquor Control Commission Director/Oregon, Defendants.


ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (#58) on January 20, 2012, in which he recommends this Court grant Defendants' Motion (#22) to Dismiss and dismiss this matter with prejudice. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). See also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (#58). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion (#22) to Dismiss, DENIES as moot Plaintiff's Motion (#62) to Extend Discovery Cutoff, and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kofoed v. Kroger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Mar 8, 2012
3:11-CV-00444-AC (D. Or. Mar. 8, 2012)
Case details for

Kofoed v. Kroger

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH W. KOFOED, Plaintiff, v. JOHN KROGER, Attorney General/Oregon; JOHN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Mar 8, 2012

Citations

3:11-CV-00444-AC (D. Or. Mar. 8, 2012)