From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koetje v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nov 18, 2016
No. 69994 (Nev. App. Nov. 18, 2016)

Opinion

No. 69994

11-18-2016

ERIN M. KOETJE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, of child abuse, neglect, or endangerment with substantial bodily harm and use of a controlled substance in the presence of a child. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Elissa F. Cadish, Judge.

Appellant Erin M. Koetje claims the district court abused its discretion at sentencing and the sentence imposed constitutes cruel and unusual punishment because she took responsibility for her crime and pleaded guilty and because the medical doctors were in disagreement as to the cause of the victim's injuries. We disagree.

At sentencing, the severe injuries that the infant victim sustained were described to the district court. The district court indicated that regardless of whether Koetje inflicted the injuries herself, allowed an unqualified person to care for her child, or was negligent in seeking medical care for her child, her actions required substantial punishment and probation was not warranted. The district court imposed a prison term of 60 to 180 months for child abuse and neglect and a concurrent prison term of 24 to 60 months for use of a controlled substance.

The sentence imposed is within the parameters provided by the relevant statutes, see NRS 193.130(2)(c); NRS 200.508(2)(a)(2); NRS 453.3325(2)(a)(1), and Koetje does not allege that those statutes are unconstitutional. See Blume v. State, 112 Nev. 472, 475, 915 P.2d 282, 284 (1996). Koetje also does not allege the district court relied on impalpable or highly suspect evidence. See Silks v. State, 92 Nev. 91, 94, 545 P.2d 1159, 1161 (1976). We conclude the sentence imposed is not grossly disproportionate to the crime and does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment, see Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1000-01 (1991) (plurality opinion), and the district court did not abuse its discretion when imposing sentence, see Houk v. State, 103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987). Therefore, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Silver cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge

Clark County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Koetje v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nov 18, 2016
No. 69994 (Nev. App. Nov. 18, 2016)
Case details for

Koetje v. State

Case Details

Full title:ERIN M. KOETJE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 18, 2016

Citations

No. 69994 (Nev. App. Nov. 18, 2016)