From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 21, 1993
628 A.2d 985 (Conn. 1993)

Opinion

(14795)

Decided June 21, 1993


The defendant Susan Oygard's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 395 (AC 8672), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that an appellant's failure to file a zoning appeal within the thirty day time limit provided in General Statutes 8-7 deprives a zoning board of appeals of subject matter jurisdiction to hear the appeal?

"2. If the answer to question (1) is yes, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, Oygard's appeal was untimely?"


Mark K. Branse, in support of the petition.

Duncan J. Forsyth, in opposition.


Summaries of

Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 21, 1993
628 A.2d 985 (Conn. 1993)
Case details for

Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Case Details

Full title:ALAN J. KOEPKE v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF COVENTRY ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jun 21, 1993

Citations

628 A.2d 985 (Conn. 1993)
628 A.2d 985

Citing Cases

Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals

We granted certification of Oygard's appeal limited to the following issues: (1) "Did the Appellate Court…