From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koenig v. Koenig

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 26, 2022
2:21-CV-1145-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-CV-1145-TLN-DMC-P

04-26-2022

JAMES STANLEY KOENIG, Petitioner, v. C. KOENIG, Respondent.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner's motion, ECF No. 34, for an extension of time to file a traverse. Good cause appearing therefor based on Petitioner's declaration of the need for additional time to the extent the Court denies Petitioner's request for the appointment of counsel, which request is denied by separate order, Petitioner's motion for an extension of time is granted. Petitioner may file a traverse within 30 days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Koenig v. Koenig

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 26, 2022
2:21-CV-1145-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Koenig v. Koenig

Case Details

Full title:JAMES STANLEY KOENIG, Petitioner, v. C. KOENIG, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 26, 2022

Citations

2:21-CV-1145-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2022)