From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koehring Company v. Spaniola

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 13, 1996
672 So. 2d 854 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 94-3089.

March 27, 1996. Certification of Question Denied May 13, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit; Broward County, Mel Grossman, Judge.

Edward T. O'Donnell of Law Offices of Edward T. O'Donnell, Miami, for appellants.

Paul J. Lowe and Anthony K. Goodman of Sheldon J. Schlesinger, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellees-Spaniola.


We reverse the trial court's failure to tax the cost of the deposition of the witness Hargreaves. From our review of the record, we conclude that the Hargreaves deposition was reasonably necessary in supporting defendants' motion for summary judgment on the statute of repose.

In all other respects, however, we affirm the order on defendants' motion to tax costs.

GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Koehring Company v. Spaniola

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 13, 1996
672 So. 2d 854 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Koehring Company v. Spaniola

Case Details

Full title:KOEHRING COMPANY, A WISCONSIN CORPORATION; AMCA VENTURES, INC., A DELAWARE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 13, 1996

Citations

672 So. 2d 854 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)