From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koehler v. Hankins

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Jul 18, 2013
Cause number: 01-13-00498-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 18, 2013)

Opinion

Cause number: 01-13-00498-CV

07-18-2013

Willie Koehler v. Reba Hankins and Amoco Federal Credit Union


ORDER ON MOTION

Type of motion: Motion for appointment of counsel Party filing motion: Appellant, pro se Document to be filed: ______________________ ordered that motion is:

[ ] Granted
if document is to be filed, document due ______________________
[√] Denied
[ ] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
Appellant is not entitled to appointed counsel in this case. See Gibson v. Tolbert, 102 S.W.3d 710, 712 (Tex. 2003); Mustapha v. HSB CBank USA, Nat'l Ass'n, No. 14-11-00112-CV, 2012 WL 273897, at *1 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 31, 2012, pet. Denied) (not designated for publication). Appellant's motion is denied. Judge's signature: Sherry Radack

[√] Acting individually


Summaries of

Koehler v. Hankins

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Jul 18, 2013
Cause number: 01-13-00498-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Koehler v. Hankins

Case Details

Full title:Willie Koehler v. Reba Hankins and Amoco Federal Credit Union

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Jul 18, 2013

Citations

Cause number: 01-13-00498-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 18, 2013)