From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knox v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 11, 2013
3:11-cv-00555-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Apr. 11, 2013)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00555-LRH-RAM

04-11-2013

MONTENEQUE N. KNOX, Petitioner, v. BAKER, Respondent.


ORDER

On August 12, 2011, the court entered an order dismissing this action because petitioner had submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis, but had not submitted a petition or any other documents (ECF #3). On August 15, 2011, judgment was entered (ECF #4).

Petitioner has now filed a motion for immediate release (ECF #9). However, this action is closed, and this motion must be denied as moot. As petitioner has been previously advised, if he wishes to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus he must either pay the filing fee or submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a habeas petition, both on the court's approved forms.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion for immediate release (ECF #9) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall file no more documents in this closed case.

_________________________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Knox v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 11, 2013
3:11-cv-00555-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Apr. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Knox v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:MONTENEQUE N. KNOX, Petitioner, v. BAKER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 11, 2013

Citations

3:11-cv-00555-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Apr. 11, 2013)