Opinion
3:11-cv-00555-LRH-RAM
04-11-2013
ORDER
On August 12, 2011, the court entered an order dismissing this action because petitioner had submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis, but had not submitted a petition or any other documents (ECF #3). On August 15, 2011, judgment was entered (ECF #4).
Petitioner has now filed a motion for immediate release (ECF #9). However, this action is closed, and this motion must be denied as moot. As petitioner has been previously advised, if he wishes to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus he must either pay the filing fee or submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a habeas petition, both on the court's approved forms.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion for immediate release (ECF #9) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall file no more documents in this closed case.
_________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE