From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knirnschild v. Pittsburgh Brewing Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 11, 1957
390 Pa. 606 (Pa. 1957)

Opinion

October 9, 1957.

November 11, 1957.

Contracts — Evidence — Parol evidence rule — Written agreement — Separate letter waiving commission rights.

In this action of assumpsit by a real estate broker in which it appeared that a form of written agreement for the sale of land owned by the defendant contained a provision that plaintiff "shall be entitled to a broker's commission of five per cent. in the event the deed is delivered in accordance with the terms of this agreement, to be paid by" defendant, and also contained a statement signed by the plaintiff that "he agrees that there will be no commission due to him unless the deed is delivered in accordance with the terms of this agreement"; and it appeared that the written agreement signed by the respective purchasers and by the plaintiff was delivered to the defendant with a deposit money check but was not signed by the defendant; that thereafter on November 18, 1953 the plaintiff delivered to the defendant a letter signed by him which contained the statement "I will look entirely to the buyer for compensation and I cancel all responsibility inferred or real on the part of the" defendant; and four weeks thereafter the agreement of sale was signed by the defendant and settlement was subsequently made; and at the trial plaintiff testified that it was orally agreed between plaintiff and defendant that if the contract between defendant and the purchasers was not accepted by the defendant within five days after the letter was delivered on November 18, 1953, the letter waiving the commission would be of no effect and was to become null and void, it was Held that such oral testimony was a violation of the parol evidence rule which was applicable and that the court below had properly entered judgment n.o.v. for the defendant.

Before JONES, C. J., BELL, CHIDSEY, MUSMANNO, ARNOLD, JONES and COHEN, JJ.

Appeal, No. 250, March T., 1957, from judgment of Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Oct. T., 1954, No. 2498 B, in case of L. C. Knirnschild v. Pittsburgh Brewing Company. Judgment affirmed; reargument refused December 11, 1957.

Same case in court below: 9 Pa. D. C.2d 623.

Assumpsit. Before O'BRIEN, J.

Verdict for plaintiff in the amount of $5,600; defendant's motion for judgment n.o.v. granted, and final judgment entered. Plaintiff appealed.

Leroy F. Perry, with him William A. Blair and Griggs, Moreland, Blair Douglass, for appellant.

McCook Miller, with him Lawrence P. Monahan, Edwin R. McMillin, II, and Kirkpatrick, Pomeroy, Lockhart Johnson, for appellee.


This case is affirmed on the able and comprehensive opinion of Judge HENRY X. O'BRIEN, writing for the court below, as reported in 9 Pa. D. C.2d 623.


Summaries of

Knirnschild v. Pittsburgh Brewing Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 11, 1957
390 Pa. 606 (Pa. 1957)
Case details for

Knirnschild v. Pittsburgh Brewing Co.

Case Details

Full title:Knirnschild, Appellant, v. Pittsburgh Brewing Company

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 11, 1957

Citations

390 Pa. 606 (Pa. 1957)
136 A.2d 316

Citing Cases

Rempel v. Nationwide Life Ins. Co., Inc.

See, e.g., International Milling Co. v. Hachmeister, 380 Pa. 407 (1955); 3 Corbin on Contracts § 573 (1960).…

Morgan v. A. Frost, Inc.

(citation, original quotation marks, and brackets omitted). Parol evidence may not be received where the…