From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knight v. Kelly

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jun 16, 1986
345 S.E.2d 490 (S.C. 1986)

Opinion

22572

Heard May 20, 1986.

Decided June 16, 1986.

Thomas B. Bryant, III of Bryant, Fanning Yarborough, Orangeburg, for appellant. Charles H. Williams of Williams Williams, Orangeburg, and Richard B. Ness of Early, Kemp Ness, Bamberg, for respondent.


Heard May 20, 1986.

Decided June 16, 1986.


Appellant contends that the circuit court erred in failing to afford him a jury trial, a trial de novo, or the opportunity to introduce further evidence in his appeal from the probate court.

This Court adopts the opinion issued by the Court of Appeals in Martin v. Skinner, 286 S.C. 527, 335 S.E.2d 252 (Ct.App. 1985) in toto. That case is dispositive of the issues raised on this appeal.

Affirmed.

NESS, C.J., not participating.


Summaries of

Knight v. Kelly

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jun 16, 1986
345 S.E.2d 490 (S.C. 1986)
Case details for

Knight v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:Pauline H. KNIGHT, Respondent v. William W. KELLY, Executor of the Estate…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 16, 1986

Citations

345 S.E.2d 490 (S.C. 1986)
345 S.E.2d 490

Citing Cases

Van Sant ex rel. Will & Testament of Collins v. Smith

Such an appeal is in reality a special proceeding which affords the parties the right to a trial by jury.…