From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knecht v. City of Cincinnati

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 28, 2015
Case No. 1:12-cv-763 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 28, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-cv-763

04-28-2015

CHRISTOPHER KNECHT, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CINCINNATI, OHIO, et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman

DECISION AND ENTRY:

1. ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 63); AND



2. GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS DEFENDANT SPRINGS AND MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JOINDER OF PARTY DEFENDANT (Doc. 67).

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to the United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the motion of the City to set aside this Court's entry of default judgment and for leave to file its Amended Answer out of time (Doc. 56), and on March 16, 2015, she submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 65).

In her Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge found the City's motion well-taken, such that she recommended it be granted, that the Clerk's entry of default be vacated, and that the City be granted leave to file its Answer out of time, nunc pro tunc, and the Answer be accepted as filed (Doc. 63). Plaintiff objected, (Doc. 65), but upon further consideration appears to prefer to move this matter toward consideration of the merits rather than to fight a procedural battle (Doc. 67). As such, in his motion, he essentially abandons his efforts against the individual defendants, so as to avoid litigation over the question of qualified immunity (Id.). He further moves the Court to withdraw his motion for leave to file an Amended Complaint (Id.).

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 6369(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo the relevant filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. The Court further finds Plaintiff's unopposed motion well-taken. Accordingly:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 63) is ADOPTED.



2. Defendant's Motion to Set Aside the Entry of Default (Doc. 56) is GRANTED.



3. The Clerk's Entry of Default (Doc. 55) is VACATED.



4. The City is granted leave to file its Answer out of time, nunc pro tunc, and the City's Answer (Doc. 43) is ACCEPTED as FILED.



5. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Defendant Margo Springs, and to withdraw his pending Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint and for Joinder of a Party Defendant (Doc. 67).

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 4/28/15

/s/_________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Knecht v. City of Cincinnati

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 28, 2015
Case No. 1:12-cv-763 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Knecht v. City of Cincinnati

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER KNECHT, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CINCINNATI, OHIO, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 28, 2015

Citations

Case No. 1:12-cv-763 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 28, 2015)