From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kneapler v. Braufman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 26, 1943
266 App. Div. 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Opinion

April 26, 1943.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order vacating a warrant of attachment.


Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, and the attachment reinstated. The affidavit of November 27, 1942, upon which the warrant of attachment issued, sufficiently complies with subdivision 3, section 903, Civil Practice Act, in that it makes a prima facie evidentiary showing of secretion of assets by defendants in fraud of creditors, and particularly in fraud of plaintiff. The merits of the controversy may not be determined on this motion. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kneapler v. Braufman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 26, 1943
266 App. Div. 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)
Case details for

Kneapler v. Braufman

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM KNEAPLER, Appellant, v. SAMUEL BRAUFMAN, Doing Business under the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 26, 1943

Citations

266 App. Div. 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Citing Cases

Sugar v. Curtis Circulation Company

Indeed under the decisions of New York courts, the merits of the action are irrelevant on a motion to vacate…

Bank of Leumi Trust Co. v. Istim, Inc.

Direct proof of the fact can rarely be obtained, and when it is established it must ordinarily be inferred…