Opinion
Argued May 6, 1892
Decided May 24, 1892
W. Farrington for appellant.
George Holmes for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Klupp v. United Ice Lines
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 24, 1892
31 N.E. 234 (N.Y. 1892)
Summaries of
Klupp v. United Ice Lines
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 24, 1892
31 N.E. 234 (N.Y. 1892)
Case details for
Klupp v. United Ice Lines
Case Details
Full title:AUGUST C. KLUPP, Appellant, v . THE UNITED ICE LINES, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: May 24, 1892
Citations
31 N.E. 234 (N.Y. 1892)
133 N.Y. 666
45 N.Y. St. Rptr. 930
Citing Cases
San Jacinto Bldg. v. Washington
The effect of the charge of the court was to submit to the jury, without evidence, to determine the question…
Oklahoma Portland Cement Co. v. Brown"Its failure to do so was not proof of negligence, unless it appeared, from the nature of the work in which…