SUMMARY ORDER Robin Klotz appeals from a May 28, 2008, 557 F.Supp.2d 400, order of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York granting summary judgment in. favor of Defendants-Appellees on the ground that Klotz failed to exhaust administrative remedies. Klotz seeks the restoration of disability benefits under a plan covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.
DOL regulations prohibit claims procedures from requiring more than two appeals before judicial review becomes available. See Klotz v. Xerox Corp., 557 F. Supp. 2d 400, 406 (W.D.N.Y. 2008) (citing 29 C.F.R. § 2560.503-1(c)(2)). B. Application
Eastman Kodak, 452 F.3d at 219 (quoting Jones, 223 F.3d 130 at 140 (internal quotation marks omitted)).Klotz v. Xerox Corp., 557 F. Supp. 2d 400, 407 (W.D.N.Y. 2008), aff'd Klotz v. Xerox Corp., No. 08-3214-cv, 332 Fed. Appx. 668 (2d Cir. Jun. 5, 2009). Nothing plead in the complaint shows that Plaintiff timely exhausted his administrative remedies under the KMAP.