From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kloepfer v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Oct 31, 2013
No. 05-13-00723-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 31, 2013)

Opinion

No. 05-13-00723-CR

10-31-2013

AARON HOWARD KLOEPFER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-81623-2012


ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant's brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant's presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant's absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Kloepfer v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Oct 31, 2013
No. 05-13-00723-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Kloepfer v. State

Case Details

Full title:AARON HOWARD KLOEPFER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Oct 31, 2013

Citations

No. 05-13-00723-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 31, 2013)