From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kline v. Sandvik

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jun 12, 2024
24-cv-0121 (JRT/DLM) (D. Minn. Jun. 12, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-0121 (JRT/DLM)

06-12-2024

Dean Ryan Kline, Plaintiff, v. Steve Sandvik, Nate Hagen, Kea I. Maxwell, and Jeffrey Kritzer, Defendants.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

DOUGLAS L. MICKO United States Magistrate Judge

On May 9, 2024, this Court entered an order giving Plaintiff Ryan Dean Kline 21 days-that is, until May 30, 2024-to submit this action's filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (See Doc. 5 at 1.) That deadline has now passed, and Mr. Kline has not submitted a filing fee or an IFP application. Accordingly, the Court now recommends dismissing this action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. See, e.g., Henderson v. Renaissance Grand Hotel, 267 Fed.Appx. 496, 497 (8th Cir. 2008) (per curiam) (“A district court has discretion to dismiss an action under Rule 41(b) for a plaintiff's failure to prosecute, or to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or any court order.”).

RECOMMENDATION

Based on the foregoing, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED THAT this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.


Summaries of

Kline v. Sandvik

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jun 12, 2024
24-cv-0121 (JRT/DLM) (D. Minn. Jun. 12, 2024)
Case details for

Kline v. Sandvik

Case Details

Full title:Dean Ryan Kline, Plaintiff, v. Steve Sandvik, Nate Hagen, Kea I. Maxwell…

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Jun 12, 2024

Citations

24-cv-0121 (JRT/DLM) (D. Minn. Jun. 12, 2024)