From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Klein v. White Street, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 3, 1963
41 Misc. 2d 601 (N.Y. App. Term 1963)

Opinion

December 3, 1963

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, DANIEL G. CONNOLLY, J.

Stanley E. Gould for appellant.

Tropp Steinbock ( I. Sidney Worthman of counsel), for respondent.


Section 192 (subd. c, par. [2]) of the New York City Civil Court Act does not preclude consideration of a motion to increase the ad damnum clause above $3,000 on the merits, simply because the case was originally instituted in the Municipal Court and transferred automatically. ( Cohen v. Bezold, 37 Misc.2d 1081; Dolce v. Cayuga Foundation Corp., 38 Misc.2d 1078.)

The order should be reversed, without costs, and motion remanded for determination on the merits.

Concur — BROWN, GULOTTA and GROAT, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Klein v. White Street, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 3, 1963
41 Misc. 2d 601 (N.Y. App. Term 1963)
Case details for

Klein v. White Street, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AL KLEIN, Appellant, v. 124-132 WHITE STREET, INC., Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Dec 3, 1963

Citations

41 Misc. 2d 601 (N.Y. App. Term 1963)
246 N.Y.S.2d 277

Citing Cases

Sobelsohn v. Pincus

In Cohen v. Bezold ( 37 Misc.2d 1081) and in Dolce v. Cayuga Foundation Corp. ( 38 Misc.2d 1078), Civil Court…

Newman v. Coakley

Moreover, this court always has strictly construed statutes limiting jurisdiction of local trial courts.…