From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kleidman v. Collins

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 8, 2022
2:22-cv-03263-CJC (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-03263-CJC (JDE)

12-08-2022

PETER KLEIDMAN, Plaintiff, v. JUSTICE AUDREY B. COLLINS., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CORMAC J CARNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file, including the Complaint (Dkt. 1) filed by Plaintiff Peter Kleidman (“Plaintiff”), Plaintiff's operative First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 13, “FAC”), the Motion to Dismiss the FAC (Dkt. 15, “Motion”) filed by the named defendants (“Defendants”), Defendants' Supplement to the Motion (Dkt. 18), Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion and Request for Judicial Notice (Dkt. 19, 21), the Report and Recommendation of the assigned Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 23, “Report”), and the Objections and Amended Objections to the Report and additional Requests for Judicial Notice filed by Plaintiff (Dkt. 27-30).

The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Motion (Dkt. 15) is GRANTED as to all claims against all Defendants without leave to amend;

2. Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action accordingly.


Summaries of

Kleidman v. Collins

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 8, 2022
2:22-cv-03263-CJC (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Kleidman v. Collins

Case Details

Full title:PETER KLEIDMAN, Plaintiff, v. JUSTICE AUDREY B. COLLINS., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 8, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-03263-CJC (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2022)