From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kleeger v. Kleeger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 1999
261 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 24, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The appellant is barred by the doctrine of unclean hands from seeking the equitable remedy of recovering money obtained through unjust enrichment ( see, Nicolaides v. Nicolaides, 173 A.D.2d 448, 451; Cohn Berk v. Rothman-Goodman Mgt. Corp., 125 A.D.2d 435).

The appellant's remaining contention is without merit.

Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kleeger v. Kleeger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 1999
261 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Kleeger v. Kleeger

Case Details

Full title:CINDY KLEEGER, Respondent, v. SHELDON KLEEGER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 24, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
688 N.Y.S.2d 921

Citing Cases

UB PROPS., LTD. v. ARIES DESIGN MGT., INC.

The third and fourth affirmative defenses contend that the doctrines of equitable estoppel and unclean hands,…

Melius v. Breslin

In view of the foregoing, the weight of the credible evidence does not support the plaintiffs' contention…