From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Ctr. v. Bureau of Land Mgmt.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION
Feb 6, 2014
No. 1:12-CV-1558-CL (D. Or. Feb. 6, 2014)

Opinion

No. 1:12-CV-1558-CL

02-06-2014

KLAMATH SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Defendant.


ORDER

PANNER, District Judge:

Plaintiffs claim that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by approving the MC Thin Timber Sale, which would allow logging on about 180 acres in the Little Butte Creek Key Watershed.

The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Defendant moved to strike extra-record material. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that this action be dismissed and that defendant's motion to strike be granted in part and denied-in part.

Plaintiffs object to the Report and Recommendation, so I have reviewed this matter de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach.,' Inc., 656 F. 2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I adopt the thorough and well-reasoned R&R.

CONCLUSION

The Report and Recommendation (#32) is adopted. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment (#12) is denied. Defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment (#14) is granted. Defendant's motion to strike (#19) is granted in part and denied in part.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Ctr. v. Bureau of Land Mgmt.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION
Feb 6, 2014
No. 1:12-CV-1558-CL (D. Or. Feb. 6, 2014)
Case details for

Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Ctr. v. Bureau of Land Mgmt.

Case Details

Full title:KLAMATH SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BUREAU OF LAND…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION

Date published: Feb 6, 2014

Citations

No. 1:12-CV-1558-CL (D. Or. Feb. 6, 2014)

Citing Cases

Nw. Envtl. Advocates v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv.

To be sure, consideration of post-decisional information has consistently been denied by courts in this…