K.L. v. E.H.

14 Citing cases

  1. Involuntary Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of B.J. v. Ind. Dep't of Child Servs.

    No. 23A-JT-2896 (Ind. App. Jul. 25, 2024)

    [¶45] The admission of evidence is entrusted to the sound discretion of the trial court. K.L. v. E.H., 6 N.E.3d 1021, 1030 (Ind.Ct.App. 2014).

  2. L.M. v. Ind. Dep't of Child Servs.

    172 N.E.3d 694 (Ind. App. 2021)

    [21] The admission or exclusion of evidence is entrusted to the sound discretion of the trial court. K.L. v. E.H. , 6 N.E.3d 1021, 1030 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). Accordingly, evidentiary rulings of a trial court are afforded great deference on appeal and are overturned only for a showing of an abuse of discretion.

  3. In re L.M.

    No. 21A-JT-230 (Ind. App. Jul. 14, 2021)

    [¶21] The admission or exclusion of evidence is entrusted to the sound discretion of the trial court. K.L. v. E.H., 6 N.E.3d 1021, 1030 (Ind.Ct.App. 2014). Accordingly, evidentiary rulings of a trial court are afforded great deference on appeal and are overturned only for a showing of an abuse of discretion.

  4. In re D.D.

    19 N.E.3d 418 (Ind. App. 2014)

    The admission of evidence is entrusted to the sound discretion of the trial court. K.L. v. E.H., 6 N.E.3d 1021, 1030 (Ind.Ct.App.2014). Accordingly, evidentiary rulings of a trial court are afforded great deference on appeal and are overturned only for a showing of an abuse of discretion.

  5. Pinkham v. Coca-Cola Refreshments U.S., Inc.

    No. 1:18-cv-01096-SEB-TAB (S.D. Ind. Aug. 13, 2018)

    11(A) arguably creates a discovery privilege with regard to the mediator, and Indiana courts interpret this ban broadly. SeeIn re March, 1994 Spec. Grand Jury, 897 F. Supp. 1170, 1172 (S.D. Ind. 1995) (applying a previous version of the rule and calling it a "mediators' privilege"); K.L. v. E.H., 6 N.E.3d 1021, 1031 (Ind. App. 2014) (refusing to allow mediator testimony regarding behavior at mediation in a child custody dispute). However, Pinkham cites no authority for a privilege that would exclude from discovery information discussed at a settlement mediation.

  6. Hudson v. Traut

    No. 23A-MI-1561 (Ind. App. Dec. 28, 2023)

    K.L. v. E.H., 6 N.E.3d 1021, 1032 (Ind.Ct.App. 2014) (internal citations omitted).

  7. Marshall v. Powers

    No. 22A-MI-1010 (Ind. App. Oct. 31, 2022)

    K.L. v. E.H., 6 N.E.3d 1021, 1032 (Ind.Ct.App. 2014) (internal citations omitted).

  8. LaMere v. Anderson

    No. 22A-DN-71 (Ind. App. May. 27, 2022)

    When an appellee fails to submit a brief, we do not undertake the burden of developing the appellee's arguments. K.L. v. E.H., 6 N.E.3d 1021, 1029 (Ind.Ct.App. 2014).

  9. Romero v. McVey

    167 N.E.3d 361 (Ind. App. 2021)   Cited 7 times
    Noting the grandparent visitation action was allowed to proceed where an adoption proceeding already had begun but had not yet resulted in a decree

    Thus, we review a trial court's grandparent visitation order for an abuse of discretion. K.L. v. E.H., 6 N.E.3d 1021, 1031 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). An abuse of discretion occurs when the trial court's decision is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances presented.

  10. Welbourne v. Mays

    165 N.E.3d 117 (Ind. App. 2021)

    As such, we review a trial court's order on grandparent visitation for an abuse of discretion. K.L. v. E.H. , 6 N.E.3d 1021, 1031 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). An abuse of discretion occurs when the trial court's decision is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances presented.