From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kitani v. N.Y.C. Transit

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 23, 2021
19-CV-1043 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 23, 2021)

Opinion

19-CV-1043 (VSB)

09-23-2021

MIKIKO KITANI, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge.

I am in receipt of Plaintiff's letter request to amend her second amended complaint, dated September 22, 2021. (Doc. 78.) Plaintiff reports in her letter that she filed a charge with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) in May 2020, but does not specify the party or parties named in her charge form or the particulars of those charges. Nor does Plaintiff attach the EEOC charge form or her proposed amendments. So that I may assess the propriety of Plaintiff's request, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff shall submit a letter: (1) attaching any supplemental information detailing the basis for and nature of the proposed amendments and/or a copy of her proposed amended complaint; (2) attaching a copy of her EEOC charge form, if applicable; and (3) providing any additional reasons compelling the granting of leave to amend in this instance, by on or before October 1, 2021.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by or on October 15, 2021, Defendants shall submit any response to Plaintiff's request, including an indication of whether or not they consent to Plaintiff's request.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's reply, if any, is due by or on October 22, 2021.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kitani v. N.Y.C. Transit

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 23, 2021
19-CV-1043 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Kitani v. N.Y.C. Transit

Case Details

Full title:MIKIKO KITANI, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 23, 2021

Citations

19-CV-1043 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 23, 2021)