From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kitain v. Windley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 14, 2001
283 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued April 20, 2001.

May 14, 2001.

In consolidated actions to foreclose a mortgage on real property and to rescind a mortgage, the defendant Cardell E. Windley appeals from a judgment of foreclosure of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), entered June 3, 1999, which, upon an order of the same court, dated November 20, 1998, inter alia, granting the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $69,964.41.

Regina Felton, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.

Diane C. Nardone, New York, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: O'BRIEN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, FEUERSTEIN and COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted partial summary judgment to the plaintiff mortgagee. The plaintiff established his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting proof of the existence of the mortgage and note and alleging the appellant's failure to make the mortgage payments. In response, the appellant did not dispute that he had defaulted on the mortgage and asserted no defenses which would raise a question of fact as to his default, such as waiver, bad faith, fraud, or oppressive or unconscionable conduct by the mortgagee (see Nassau Trust Co. v. Montrose Concrete Prods. Corp., 56 N.Y.2d 175; Miller Planning Corp. v. Wells, 253 A.D.2d 859).


Summaries of

Kitain v. Windley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 14, 2001
283 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Kitain v. Windley

Case Details

Full title:SOL KITAIN, RESPONDENT, v. CARDELL E. WINDLEY, APPELLANT, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 14, 2001

Citations

283 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
724 N.Y.S.2d 641

Citing Cases

Malik v. Bernitt

Malcolm v. Allen, 49 NY 448; Graf v. Hope Building Corp., 254 NY 1.See Kitain v. Windley, 283 AD2d 463 (2nd…

M T Mtge. Corp. v. Alleyne

We reverse the order insofar as appealed from. M T established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law…