From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kister v. Appalachian Behavioral Healthcare

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jul 1, 2013
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-1225 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 1, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:12-CV-1225

07-01-2013

CHAD KISTER, Petitioner, v. APPALACHIAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, Respondent.


JUDGE SARGUS

MAGISTRATE JUDGE ABEL


OPINION AND ORDER

On February 15, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 be dismissed without prejudice as unexhausted. Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kister v. Appalachian Behavioral Healthcare

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jul 1, 2013
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-1225 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Kister v. Appalachian Behavioral Healthcare

Case Details

Full title:CHAD KISTER, Petitioner, v. APPALACHIAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 1, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 2:12-CV-1225 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 1, 2013)