From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kirman v. Hunnewill

Supreme Court of California
Sep 11, 1891
91 Cal. 157 (Cal. 1891)

Opinion

         Motion to dismiss appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mono County.

         COUNSEL

          William O. Parker, C. A. Schuman, and James E. Goodal, for Appellants.

          Richard S. Miner, for Respondents.


         JUDGES: In Bank.

         OPINION

         THE COURT

         Motion to dismiss appeal.

         The judgment in this cause was entered November 2, 1888, and the appeal therefrom was not taken until more than one year thereafter; viz., December 8, 1890. The motion to dismiss the appeal therefrom must therefore be granted.

         Whether the appellants are entitled to have the execution of the judgment stayed until the determination of the appeal from the order denying a new trial cannot be considered upon this motion. (See Fulton v. Hanna , 40 Cal. 278.)

         The appeal from the judgment is dismissed.


Summaries of

Kirman v. Hunnewill

Supreme Court of California
Sep 11, 1891
91 Cal. 157 (Cal. 1891)
Case details for

Kirman v. Hunnewill

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD KIRMAN et al., Respondents, v. N. B. HUNNEWILL et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Sep 11, 1891

Citations

91 Cal. 157 (Cal. 1891)
27 P. 587

Citing Cases

De Wolfskill v. Smith

The law is well settled that water flowing from springs upon the public lands of the United States is subject…