Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Kipp v. Paul

2 Citing cases

  1. State v. Holt

    121 Mont. 459 (Mont. 1948)   Cited 30 times
    In State v. Holt (1948), 121 Mont. 459, 194 P.2d 651, the Court interpreted the effect of State Liquor Control Act, a comprehensive piece of legislation enacted in 1933 in anticipation of a "day of jubilee" following the repeal of Eighteenth Amendment on state prohibition laws not expressly repealed by the Control Act.

    There is no room to resort to it nor is there room for any strained or subtle construction where the language of an Act is clear. Kipp v. Paul, 110 Mont. 513, 103 P.2d 675; Vaughn Ragsdale Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 109 Mont. 52, 96 P.2d 420. The retail liquor dealers' license Act is clear as to the offense committed by a licensee or his employee under the Act who sells liquor to a person under 21 years of age, and as to the penalty for such offense, and as to the jurisdiction of the offense.

  2. Kipp v. Paul

    103 P.2d 678 (Mont. 1940)

    MR. JUSTICE ERICKSON delivered the opinion of the court. This is a companion case to Kipp v. Paul, ante, p. 513, 103 P.2d 675, decided this day, and the allegations of the complaint are the same as in that case, except that here the defendant is a co-surety and the suit is for the co-surety's proportionate share of the amount paid by the plaintiff on the principal's obligation. Property of the defendant was attached on this complaint.