From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinstle v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Dec 29, 2021
No. 22070-21 (U.S.T.C. Dec. 29, 2021)

Opinion

22070-21

12-29-2021

James Kinstle Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge

On June 21, 2021, the Court received from petitioner a letter, which letter referenced a dispute with respect to the 2018 taxable year. To protect any statutory time period within which to begin a case, the Court filed that letter as a petition to commence this case at Docket No. 22070-21. On September 16 and 17, 2021, the Court issued Orders directing the filing of a Ratification of Petition and payment of the filing fee for this litigation on or before November 1, 2021, and October 28, 2021, respectively. On October 13, 2021, the Court then received from petitioner a further letter indicating that petitioner did not intend by the initial correspondence with this Court to begin a case herein and requesting that the case be dismissed. Accordingly, it appearing that petitioner does not intend to file a Ratification of Petition and pay the filing fee as directed in the Court's Orders, it is

ORDERED that, on the Court's own motion, this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Kinstle v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Dec 29, 2021
No. 22070-21 (U.S.T.C. Dec. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Kinstle v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:James Kinstle Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Dec 29, 2021

Citations

No. 22070-21 (U.S.T.C. Dec. 29, 2021)