From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinney v. Wasserman

Court of Appeals of Ohio
Oct 28, 1957
148 N.E.2d 67 (Ohio Ct. App. 1957)

Opinion

Nos. 8331 8332

Decided October 28, 1957.

Gift inter vivos — Shares of stock — Execution of instrument transferring shares — Retaining right to control during lifetime — Certificates transferred to third party — Transferee trustee.

Where the owner of shares of stock executes a written instrument in which he transfers such shares to his wife and brother, but expressing an intention to retain control of the stock and of the company during his lifetime, causes the certificates of stock to the transferred from his name and delivers them to a third party to hold until his death, the transferee of such certificates holds them in trust for the benefit of the wife and brother and such transfer will operate as a valid gift inter vivos.

APPEALS: Court of Appeals for Hamilton County.

Mr. Harry Kasfir, Mr. Robert French and Mr. Robert Ovington, for appellants. Mr. Robert N. Gorman, Mr. Arthur Spangenberg and Mr. Otto G. Spangenberg, for appellees.


Samuel Wasserman executed a "paper" on July 20, 1931, in which he transferred his shares of stock in the West India Coffee Company, equally to his brother, Isadore Wasserman, and his wife, Anna Wasserman. In this same paper, he stated that it was his "intention that during my lifetime I shall retain full control of said stock and of said company."

The essential question to be determined is whether the "paper" executed by Samuel Wasserman constituted a gift. It appears that what Samuel Wasserman did here was to establish a trust, reserving a life interest in the property. He did actually cause to be transferred certificates of stock from his name and delivered them to the Spangenbergs to hold till his death, thus making them trustees for the benefit of his wife and brother. It is well settled that a person may transfer property in trust and such transfer will operate as an executed gift inter vivos.

We hold that the delivery to the Spangenbergs satisfied the requirements of a valid gift inter vivos.

The judgments of the Court of Common Pleas are affirmed.

Judgments affirmed.

HILDEBRANT, P. J., and MATTHEWS, J., concur.


Summaries of

Kinney v. Wasserman

Court of Appeals of Ohio
Oct 28, 1957
148 N.E.2d 67 (Ohio Ct. App. 1957)
Case details for

Kinney v. Wasserman

Case Details

Full title:KINNEY, ADMX., ET AL., APPELLANTS v. WASSERMAN, EXRX., ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio

Date published: Oct 28, 1957

Citations

148 N.E.2d 67 (Ohio Ct. App. 1957)
148 N.E.2d 67