From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinney v. Schonfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 21, 1999
265 A.D.2d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

October 21, 1999

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered September 15, 1998, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff-appellant's attorney is also directed to pay $250 in sanctions to the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection, forthwith.


The motion court's grant of summary relief was entirely appropriate; defendant made a prima facie showing that the medical malpractice complaint was without merit and plaintiff did not in response carry her burden to produce competent medical evidence demonstrating that there were nonetheless triable factual issues respecting defendant's commission of the alleged malpractice (see, Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324) Further, we find that a sanction of $250 is warranted by plaintiff's counsel's pursuit of this patently meritless appeal, and we impose such sanction in order to deter similar conduct in the future ( 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c)).

ELLERIN, P.J., TOM, MAZZARELLI, WALLACH, LERNER, JJ.


Summaries of

Kinney v. Schonfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 21, 1999
265 A.D.2d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Kinney v. Schonfeld

Case Details

Full title:MADELINE KINNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARNOLD SCHONFELD, M.D., etc.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 21, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 460

Citing Cases

Tanel v. Kreitzer Vogelman

Furthermore, defendants' motion for summary judgment was supported by the affidavit of a medical expert who…