From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinnell v. McKune

U.S.
Jan 11, 2010
558 U.S. 1104 (2010)

Opinion

No. 09–7023.

2010-01-11

Rolly O. KINNELL, petitioner, v. David R. McKUNE, Warden, et al.


Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam ).

*1056Justice STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S.Ct. 397 and cases cited therein.


Summaries of

Kinnell v. McKune

U.S.
Jan 11, 2010
558 U.S. 1104 (2010)
Case details for

Kinnell v. McKune

Case Details

Full title:ROLLY O. KINNELL v. WARDEN McKUNE, ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 11, 2010

Citations

558 U.S. 1104 (2010)
130 S. Ct. 1055
175 L. Ed. 2d 875
78 U.S.L.W. 3394