From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinnear-Weed Corp. v. Humble Oil Ref. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 17, 1961
296 F.2d 215 (5th Cir. 1961)

Summary

holding that appellate court had jurisdiction to consider Rule 60-like motion for correction of a clerical mistake usually made to a district court

Summary of this case from In re Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans

Opinion

No. 16780.

May 17, 1961.

William E. Kinnear, Beaumont, Tex., for appellant.

Garrett R. Tucker, Jr., Houston, Tex., for appellee.

Before RIVES, JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.


It now appears to the Court that the final sentence of the opinion entered in this cause on the 22nd day of September 1958, 259 F.2d 398; Fuller v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 5 Cir., 259 F.2d 402, reading "The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed" did not carry out the theretofore clearly expressed opinion of this Court, but constituted a clerical mistake which should be corrected. A petition for certiorari pending but not ruled on does not deprive this Court of jurisdiction to make the necessary correction. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 1254; Rule 19 of the Supreme Court, 28 U.S.C.A. Nor has time or the expiration of the term affected the power of this Court to make such correction. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 452; Hines v. Royal Indemnity Co., 6 Cir. 1958, 253 F.2d 111, 113; National Comics Publications v. Fawcett Publications, 2nd Cir. 1952, 198 F.2d 927; Compare Rule 60(a), F.R.Civ.P. 28 U.S.C.A.; American Trucking Association v. Frisco Co., 1958, 358 U.S. 133, 145, 79 S.Ct. 170, 3 L.Ed.2d 172. Said final sentence of the opinion is therefore withdrawn and, in lieu thereof, there is substituted the following: "The judgment of the district court is therefore modified by striking therefrom that part which declares that U.S. Patent No. Re 23416 is invalid and void, and, as so modified, the said judgment is affirmed." The Clerk of this Court is directed to recall the mandate, and to enter a corrected judgment in accordance with this opinion, and issue a corrected mandate forthwith.


Summaries of

Kinnear-Weed Corp. v. Humble Oil Ref. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 17, 1961
296 F.2d 215 (5th Cir. 1961)

holding that appellate court had jurisdiction to consider Rule 60-like motion for correction of a clerical mistake usually made to a district court

Summary of this case from In re Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans
Case details for

Kinnear-Weed Corp. v. Humble Oil Ref. Co.

Case Details

Full title:KINNEAR-WEED CORPORATION, Appellant, v. HUMBLE OIL REFINING COMPANY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: May 17, 1961

Citations

296 F.2d 215 (5th Cir. 1961)

Citing Cases

Yokom v. Bratcher

The most common reasons for recall of mandates are to correct clerical mistakes or to make the mandate…

Pac. Amusement, Inc. v. Villanueva

This power is expressly confirmed for district courts by Commonwealth Rule of Civil Procedure 60. Thus, it is…