From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KINGVISION PAY PER VIEW v. OK NAM HO

United States District Court, N.D. California
May 9, 2003
CIVIL ACTION NO. C01-4240 JL (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2003)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. C01-4240 JL

May 9, 2003

RUTH ELIN AUERBACH (SBN 104191) GLASSBERG, POLLAK ASSOCIATES San Francisco, CA Attorneys for Plaintiff

LAW OFFICES OF ARTHUR C. LIPTON ARTHUR C. LIPTON, Attorney for Defendants.


STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER THEREON


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, by and through their respective counsel, that the within action may be Dismissed With Prejudice, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED THAT THE PARTIES CONSENT TO THE ORDER FOR DISMISSAL BEING ENTERED BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated, and good cause appearing therefor.

IT IS SO ORDERD. THE WITHIN CASE IS HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. EACH SIDE TO BEAR ITS OWN FEES AND COSTS.


Summaries of

KINGVISION PAY PER VIEW v. OK NAM HO

United States District Court, N.D. California
May 9, 2003
CIVIL ACTION NO. C01-4240 JL (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2003)
Case details for

KINGVISION PAY PER VIEW v. OK NAM HO

Case Details

Full title:KINGVISION PAY PER VIEW Plaintiff, V. OK NAM HO, etc., et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: May 9, 2003

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. C01-4240 JL (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2003)