From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kingsmore v. Staub

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct 14, 2014
445 S.W.3d 680 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. ED 100842.

2014-10-14

Ashley KINGSMORE, Petitioner/Respondent, v. James STAUB, Respondent/Appellant.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, John R. Essner, Judge. Sophya Qureshi Raza, Christopher D. Vanderbeek, Kara D. Helmuth, St. Louis, MO, for Petitioner/Respondent. Stephen J. Bardol, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent/Appellant.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, John R. Essner, Judge.
Sophya Qureshi Raza, Christopher D. Vanderbeek, Kara D. Helmuth, St. Louis, MO, for Petitioner/Respondent. Stephen J. Bardol, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent/Appellant.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

James Staub appeals from the trial court's judgment granting the request of Ashley Kingsmore to relocate with their minor child (Child). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. Ratteree v. Will, 258 S.W.3d 864, 867–68 (Mo.App.E.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Kingsmore v. Staub

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct 14, 2014
445 S.W.3d 680 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Kingsmore v. Staub

Case Details

Full title:Ashley KINGSMORE, Petitioner/Respondent, v. James STAUB…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Date published: Oct 14, 2014

Citations

445 S.W.3d 680 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)