From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kingsby v. Potter

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Jun 14, 2006
Case No. 06C0679 (E.D. Wis. Jun. 14, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 06C0679.

June 14, 2006


DECISION AND ORDER


Plaintiff Kenneth Kingsby, a pro se litigant, has filed an action under the Rehabilitaton Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 701, alleging that defendant discriminated against him on the basis of his disability when he was denied reasonable accommodations. Ordinarily, a plaintiff must pay a statutory filing fee of $350 to bring an action in federal court. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Plaintiff, however, has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Section 1915 is meant to ensure indigent litigants meaningful access to federal courts, Nietzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 324 (1989), and applies to both nonprisoner plaintiffs and to plaintiffs who are incarcerated, Floyd v. United States Postal Serv., 105 F.3d 274, 275-77 (6th Cir. 1997) ("[T]he only logical interpretation of the statute is that non-prisoners have the option to proceed in forma pauperis under § 1915(a)."). Under § 1915, an indigent party may commence a federal court action, without paying required costs and fees, upon submission of an affidavit asserting inability "to pay such fees or give security therefor" and stating "the nature of the action, defense or appeal and the affiant's belief that the person is entitled to redress." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).

Plaintiff has filed the required affidavit of indigence. Upon review of that affidavit, the court is satisfied that plaintiff meets the poverty requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Petitioner states that he has a total monthly income of $1,335. However, his monthly expenses total over $2,100.

District courts may screen complaints filed by all litigants, prisoners and non-prisoners, regardless of fee status. Rowe v. Shake, 196 F.3d 778, 783 (7th Cir. 1999). The district court may screen the complaint prior to service on the defendants, and must dismiss the complaint if it is legally "frivolous or malicious" or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Id.; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). A claim is legally frivolous when it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact. Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 31 (1992); Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). The court may, therefore, dismiss a claim as frivolous where it is based on an indisputably meritless legal theory or where the factual contentions are clearly baseless.Neitzke, 490 U.S. at 327. A complaint, or portion thereof, should be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted if it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of the claim that would entitle him to relief. Hishon v. King Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 73 (1984) (citing Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 (1957)). In the present case, plaintiff's claim that defendant discriminated against him because of his disability by denying him reasonable accommodations does not, at this stage, appear to be frivolous or malicious nor does it appear beyond doubt that plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of the claim that would entitle him to relief. Accordingly, I will not dismiss plaintiff's claim at this stage.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(2), that the U.S. Marshals Service shall serve a copy of the complaint, a waiver of service form and/or the summons, and this order upon defendants. Plaintiff is advised that Congress requires the U.S. Marshals Service to charge for making or attempting such service. 28 U.S.C. § 1921(b). The current fee for waiver-of-service packages is $8 per item. The full fee schedule is provided in Revision to United States Marshals Service Fees for Services, 65 Fed. Reg. 47,859, at 47,862 (Aug. 4, 2000) (to be codified at 28 C.F.R. §§ 0.114(a)(2), (a)(3)). Although Congress requires the court to order service by the U.S. Marshals Service precisely because in forma pauperis plaintiffs are indigent, it has not made any provision for these fees to be waived either by the court or by the U.S. Marshals Service.

Plaintiff, however, should provide defendant or his counsel with copies of all future motions or papers filed by the plaintiff in this action.


Summaries of

Kingsby v. Potter

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Jun 14, 2006
Case No. 06C0679 (E.D. Wis. Jun. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Kingsby v. Potter

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH KINGSBY, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General of the…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Jun 14, 2006

Citations

Case No. 06C0679 (E.D. Wis. Jun. 14, 2006)