Opinion
December 8, 2004.
Insurance — No — Fault Automobile Insurance. Regulations of Department of Insurance — 11 NYCRR 65.15 (e) (Claims for personal injury protection benefits; follow-up requirements).
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
King's Med. Sup. v. N.Y. Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 8, 2004
5 Misc. 3d 136 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)
Summaries of
King's Med. Sup. v. N.Y. Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 8, 2004
5 Misc. 3d 136 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)
Case details for
King's Med. Sup. v. N.Y. Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
Case Details
Full title:King's Med. Supply Inc. v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co
Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Dec 8, 2004
Citations
5 Misc. 3d 136 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 51550
Citing Cases
Star Med. Servs., P.C. v. Allstate Ins. Co.
Moreover, even assuming that the policy did contain an endorsement authorizing EUOs, defendant did not follow…
Ocean Diag. Imaging, P.C. v. Utica Mut. Ins.Med. Ctr. of Queens v. Country-Wide Ins. Co., 295 AD2d 583, 584-585), and "[a]ny attempt by the insurer to…