From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kings County Investors Corporation v. Schmidt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 2, 1936
248 App. Div. 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

July 2, 1936.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty and Davis, JJ.; Carswell, J., not voting.


Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts involving the sufficiency of affidavits upon which an order directing service of a summons by publication was based. Judgment unanimously directed for the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the contract, with costs. In our opinion, the affidavits were sufficient to confer jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Kings County Investors Corporation v. Schmidt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 2, 1936
248 App. Div. 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Kings County Investors Corporation v. Schmidt

Case Details

Full title:KINGS COUNTY INVESTORS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ARTHUR W. SCHMIDT, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 2, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)