From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kingbird v. Roy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 14, 2019
Case No. 19-CV-0452 (NEB/DTS) (D. Minn. Jun. 14, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 19-CV-0452 (NEB/DTS)

06-14-2019

AUGUST KINGBIRD, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS ROY, EMILY JOHNSON PIPER, NANCY JOHNSTON, LORI SWANSON, MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, MINNESOTA SENTENCING COMMISSION, and JANE AND JOHN DOES, in their official and individual capacities, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has received the May 9, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. [ECF No. 4 ("R&R").] No party has objected to that R&R, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED;

2. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: June 14, 2019

BY THE COURT:

s/Nancy E. Brasel

Nancy E. Brasel

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kingbird v. Roy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jun 14, 2019
Case No. 19-CV-0452 (NEB/DTS) (D. Minn. Jun. 14, 2019)
Case details for

Kingbird v. Roy

Case Details

Full title:AUGUST KINGBIRD, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS ROY, EMILY JOHNSON PIPER, NANCY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jun 14, 2019

Citations

Case No. 19-CV-0452 (NEB/DTS) (D. Minn. Jun. 14, 2019)