From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 16, 2020
CASE NUMBER: 2:19-cv-10708-MWF-AFM (C.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER: 2:19-cv-10708-MWF-AFM

09-16-2020

KURTIS TYRON ESCOBAR KING, PLAINTIFF(S), v. DEPUTY WRIGHT, et al., DEFENDANT(S).


JUDGMENT
(Failure to Pay Full Filing Fee)

On December 26, 2019 (ECF No. 5), plaintiff was permitted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, to file the above-referenced action without prepayment of the full filing fee of $350.00, but plaintiff was ordered to pay to the Clerk of Court the [ ] full filing fee [v] initial partial filing fee.

By Order to Show Cause dated July 6, 2020 (ECF No. 11), plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to timely pay the [ ] full filing fee [v] initial partial filing fee. Plaintiff has failed to file a sufficient response to the Order to Show Cause or pay the [ ] full filing fee [v] initial partial filing fee within the time allowed.

THEREFORE, IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. § 1915. September 16, 2020
Date

/s/_________

United States District Judge Presented by: /s/_________
United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

King v. Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 16, 2020
CASE NUMBER: 2:19-cv-10708-MWF-AFM (C.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2020)
Case details for

King v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:KURTIS TYRON ESCOBAR KING, PLAINTIFF(S), v. DEPUTY WRIGHT, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 16, 2020

Citations

CASE NUMBER: 2:19-cv-10708-MWF-AFM (C.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2020)